In order to better support our growing community we've set up a new more powerful forum.
The new forum is at: http://community.covecube.com
The new forum is running IP.Board and will be our primary forum from now on.
This forum is being retired, but will remain online indefinitely in order to preserve its contents. This forum is now read only.
Thank you,
Background: I posted about having a problem balancing the pool after adding a new drive. After trying everything I could including the latest Beta, I decided to scan the new drive. This is something I normally do with a new drive, but decided I was being too OCD this time, as I've never had a drive fail right away.
So, of course the new drive has 22 bad sectors. Maybe this had a part in the file copying issues? But that's not where I'm going with this.
I couldn't remove the drive from the pool, because it kept claiming that I didn't have enough space even though it's 900GB before duplication on what would then be a 3TB pool. I finally shutdown the server, unhooked the bad drive, and rebooted. I was then able to remove the missing drive from the pool. Of course this now leaves the pool badly out of balance, and in need of duplication besides which finally brings me to my question:
I was offered two choices, 1) to rebalance the pool and 2) fix the duplication issue. Which one should be done first?
Surely one of those options is the best one to do first, and since there is no info provided with those choices I don't really have a basis on which to choose. I decided to have it fix the duplication first, and it ended early claiming there was insufficient space. True, one of the small drives was full, but given that there were 4 other drives, there was plenty of room (and had been before). So it looks like I should have rebalanced first (doing that now).
Perhaps if there is always a best way to do this, the choice could be removed entirely and let DrivePool whip everything back into shape in the best way it knows how?
Comments